GAR 100 - 13th Edition

Reed Smith

Professional notice

Secured a win against Gabon and knocked out most of a US$2 billion claim for Kazakhstan

People in Who's Who Legal2
People in Future Leaders3
Pending cases as counsel183
Value of pending counsel workUS$25.9 billion
Treaty cases12
Third-party funded cases0
Current arbitrator appointments13 (5 as chair or sole)
Lawyers sitting as arbitrator9

The 2017 purchase of a team from the respected boutique Astigarraga Davis in Miami heralded Reed Smith’s arrival in the GAR 100 and brought it a new international arbitration practice head, José Astigarraga. Since then, the practice has been on something of a charge, adding additional talent around the world and seeking to harness existing elements (many already successful) into a coherent whole.

Founded in Pittsburgh in 1877, Reed Smith has enjoyed a name in energy and natural resources; life sciences; entertainment; shipping; and financial services. While lawyers within its industry groups did practise international arbitration, there was no central international arbitration practice for many years.

The current practice began to take shape around 2007 when Reed Smith merged with UK firm Richards Butler, well known for disputes in London. A construction team from Pinsent Masons arrived soon after. During that period, London was the centre of the practice: work tended to be led by Gautam Bhattacharyya, who has a focus on India and is now vice chair of the arbitration team; and Belinda Paisley, who specialises in investment treaty disputes and public international law.

Between 2008 and 2013, the practice extended to Hong Kong (when Reed Smith acquired Richards Butler’s local operations), Singapore, Houston and Astana – this last in response to an increasing amount of work from the Kazakh government.

As global practice head, Astigarraga continues to be based in Miami. He is a renowned Latin American specialist, with an enviable track record and personal network in the region.

He is also a former vice president of the LCIA, a member of the ICC commission on arbitration and ADR, and an active member of the International Bar Association. He oversaw the task force responsible for the IBA guidelines on arbitrators’ conflicts of interest.

The past few years have seen further hires. In 2017, Peter Rosher, a renowned construction and energy specialist (he is the only non-French director of the French Arbitration Association) joined from Pinsent Masons in Paris. Soon after a team of Pinsent Masons disputes lawyers joined in the Middle East – including Sachin Kerur (who was overall regional head), Michelle Nelson (head of disputes) and Shourav Lahiri (partner).


The key offices are now Miami, London, Paris, Singapore, Hong Kong, Dubai and Houston, with others in Frankfurt and New York.

The wider firm has 29 offices across the US, Europe, Asia and the Middle East. As of 2016, it also has a formal law alliance with Singaporean firm Resource Law.

Who uses it?

The firm has a policy of not naming clients, but those are known to include big names in the energy and natural resources, construction, pharmaceuticals and shipping industries.

Kazakhstan is one client in the public domain. It has used the practice for nearly two decades in ICSID and UNCITRAL matters, some worth billions of dollars. Bolivia’s state-owned telecoms company Entel and Tanzania’s national electricity company Tanesco have used members of the firm, as have General Electric and engineering and construction group SNC-Lavalin.

At their former practice, Astigarraga’s team regularly advised General Motors, GE Medical Systems, Citibank, and Ukrainian oligarchs Igor Kolomoisky and Gennadiy Bogolyubov.

Track record

Reed Smith has delivered a string of successes for Kazakhstan. In 2013, it knocked out a pair of ICSID claims each worth over US$1 billion, lodged by KT Asia and US power company AES. The first of those was tossed out at the jurisdictional stage, while AES prevailed on liability but was denied restitution or damages.

In 2010, it helped Kazakhstan win complete dismissal of a US$200 million ICSID claim by Dutch companies Liman Caspian Oil and NCL. More recently, it reduced a Turkish investor’s ICSID claim worth US$150 million to an award of just US$23 million against the state.

It defended Tanzania’s Tanesco in two ICC arbitrations worth a combined US$150 million over a power project. One arbitration went entirely the client’s way, while another became the subject of Tanzanian and English litigation that eventually settled.

The former Astigarraga Davis team’s recent highlights reel includes enforcing an ICC award in favour of the US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation against investment firm IIG Capital in the Florida courts; and winning various landmark US court decisions granting discovery in support of arbitral proceedings (in one case for a NAFTA claim).

Recent events

Reed Smith secured a US$170 million ICC award against Gabon for construction company Groupement Santullo Sericom in a dispute over money owed for work on public infrastructure projects. The state unsuccessfully argued the underlying contracts were void because of corruption.

Another case for Kazakhstan ended with the state being ordered to pay just US$50 million to a Canadian uranium mining company and its CEO out of a damages claim worth almost US$2 billion. The case was brought under an investment treaty signed by the former Soviet Union.

Reed Smith continues to defend Kazakhstan in two pending ICSID claims – brought by US energy company Big Sky and Canadian gold mining company Alhambra Resources respectively.

The firm says it secured a favourable award for Malaysian company Sime Darby in a US$1 billion ad hoc arbitration with India’s national oil company ONGC, and is now defending the award in set-aside proceedings in the Mumbai High Court.

It also helped persuade the Court of Appeal in London that US-owned arms manufacturer General Dynamics should be able to pursue enforcement of an ICC award against Libya without service through diplomatic channels, in light of the “exceptional circumstances” presented by the ongoing civil unrest in the country.

Ongoing instructions include representing California-based Tennant Energy in a C$116 million NAFTA claim it has brought against Canada at the Permanent Court of Arbitration.

It is representing L1bero Partners, a Canadian company owned by prominent Mexican businessmen, in an ICC arbitration against its partner in a joint venture to provide digital taximeter and ride-hailing technology for taxi cabs in Mexico City.

The firm reports acting in a US$1.5 billion New York-seated ICC arbitration concerning the construction of energy exploration facilities pursuant to an EPC contact in South America.

From Miami, Reed Smith continues to represent a US-based Ukrainian businessman in his US$150 million treaty claim against Estonia over the alleged expropriation of his company’s investment in a Tallinn seaport.

The firm continued its rapid expansion with a serious of partner hires. In Hong Kong, Stephen Chan arrived from local firm Oldham Li & Nie, while Mark West joined from Kennedys. Clément Fouchard, who has experience in African energy and infrastructure disputes, joined in Paris. Reed Smith’s New York office hired partner James Duffy and counsel Ben Love, who have between them acted in several investor-state cases.

There was one notable departure, with Reed Smith’s head of international arbitration in Singapore, Barry Stimpson, leaving to join Squire Patton Boggs.

Client comment

Zheng Biao, a manager at Cosco Shipping, says his company has used Reed Smith for more than 19 years and that the firm has “achieved good results without wasting money.” Hong Kong partner Li Lianjun is praised for his “practical and helpful” advice.

Japanese construction company Kumagai Gumi used the firm for a dispute over a US$300 million highway construction in South Asia. The company’s general manager Yoshiaki Tsujimoto commends their “extensive expertise” in construction issues, with partner Vincent Rowan in London proving “reliable, responsive and strategic.”

Reed Smith’s international arbitration practice spans the globe.  With offices in the world’s leading arbitral centers, including London, Paris, New York, Singapore, Hong Kong, Dubai, Miami, and Houston, we are ideally positioned to represent clients in international business disputes. 

To build on our existing strengths in arbitration, two years ago we launched an expansion of our global arbitration practice.  Since then, we have been joined by leading international arbitration lawyers in Paris, Singapore, Frankfurt, and New York, as well as Dubai and Miami, where we have added market-leading teams for disputes in the Middle East and Latin America respectively.  The most recent additions to our practice have been in Paris and New York, where we have been joined by high-profile international arbitration lawyers with wide and long-standing experience of both commercial and investor-state arbitrations, and in Hong Kong, where we have welcomed a number of partners with international arbitration experience in 2019.  

With the continuing growth of our practice through the addition of such recognized talent to our already-strong and multi-jurisdictional team of international arbitration lawyers, we now have one of the largest and most diverse international arbitration practices in the world, with the ability to represent clients in every significant arbitral center and seat around the globe.  As one of the world’s leading disputes firms, we also represent clients in arbitration-related proceedings in first instance and appellate courts, including stay and enforcement proceedings.

Our geographic reach is coupled with deep industry knowledge.  Many of our arbitration lawyers are embedded within industry groups, giving them real-life experience of the workings of our clients’ business and industries in a wide range of sectors, including energy and natural resources, shipping and transportation, international trade and commodities, pharmaceuticals, life sciences, entertainment and media, financial services, telecoms, insurance, manufacturing, and construction. 

Our team has significant experience in investor-state disputes involving bilateral and multilateral treaties under the auspices of ICSID and under the UNCITRAL rules, and in claims under the Energy Charter Treaty, advising and representing international investors, states and state-owned entities in a wide range of disputes. 

Many of our international arbitration practitioners hold leadership positions within the global arbitration community, and frequently speak at conferences on arbitration.

For more information on our international arbitration capabilities, please contact José Astigarraga at [email protected] or +1 786 747 0202.

Unlock unlimited access to all Global Arbitration Review content