Investment Treaty Arbitration

Last verified on Monday 11th September 2023

Investment Treaty Arbitration: India

, , , and

Overview of investment treaty programme

1. What are the key features of the investment treaties to which this country is a party?

India

The first ever BIT (referred to as Bilateral Investment Protection Agreement in India) entered into by India was with the United Kingdom in 1994. With the opening-up of Indian markets to foreign investment in 1991, India entered into a series of BITs (mostly with capital exporting countries) with the expectation that they would increase investors’ confidence and lead to higher foreign investment. By 2015, India had signed 83 BITs (of which 74 were in force) and several other investment chapters in international investment agreements (IIA).

The BIT regime in India gained attention in 2010 with the settlement of first-ever treaty claim launched against India[1] and in 2011, when India received its first adverse award in White Industries v Republic of India[2] under the India–Australia BIT. This opened a floodgate of BIT cases against India. By 2015, there were about 17 known BIT claims, all of which were contested by India.[3] With increased national concern around the surge of BIT arbitrations filed against India, there was a call for curtailment of investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS). Between 2012 and 2016, India revisited its BIT regime, which led to two main outcomes. The first was the adoption of a new model BIT in December 2015 (Model BIT) with the twin objects of affording ‘appropriate protection to foreign investors in India … while maintaining a balance between investor’s rights and the government’s obligations’;[4] and the second was (i) termination of the old BITs, where initial duration had concluded, or (ii) issuance of joint interpretative notes/statements (JIS) for renegotiation on basis of the Model BIT, where the BIT’s initial term was valid.

Since 2016, India has terminated 77 BITs, the most recent being the Latvia BIT; entered into several ‘new-generation BITs’, including Belarus, Brazil,[5] Taiwan[6] and Kyrgyzstan BITs all largely based on the Model BIT. Most recently, India has also entered into Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA) with the UAE on 1 May 2022 and India–Australia Economic Cooperation and Trade Agreement (ECTA) with Australia on 29 December 2022. The negotiations of other BITs/IIAs are at various stages with 37 countries or blocks.

BITs that are in force

BIT Contracting party Substantive protections Procedural rights
Fair and Equitable Treatment (FET) Expropriation Protection and Security Most-favoured-nation (MFN) Umbrella clause Cooling-off period Local courts Arbitration

Bangladesh (7 July 2011)

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

No

Six months

Yes

Yes

Belarus (5 March 2020)

No

Yes

Yes

No

No

Six months

Yes

Yes

Colombia (2 July 2012)

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Six months

 Yes

Yes

Libya

(25 March 2009)[7]

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

No

Six months

Yes

Yes

Lithuania (1 December 2011)

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Six months

Yes

Yes

Philippines (29 January 2001) 

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

No

Six months

Yes

Yes

Senegal (17 October 2009)

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Six months

Yes

Yes

Taiwan (14 February 2019

No

Yes

Yes

No

No

Six months

Yes

Yes

United Arab Emirates (21 August 2014)

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes[8]

No

Six months

Yes

Yes

BITs and MITs that are signed but not in force:

BIT contracting party or MIT Substantive protections Procedural rights
FET Expropriation Protection and security MFN Umbrella clause Cooling-off period Local courts Arbitration

Brazil (not in force)

No

Yes[9]

No

No

No

No

No

Yes

Kyrgyzstan Republic (not in force)

No

Yes

Yes

No

No

 6 months

Yes

Yes

BITs that are terminated

Between 2016 and 2021, India terminated BITs with 76 countries,[10]with Latvia as the most recent one. Note that these treaties remain relevant as the investments made before termination of these treaties remain protected under the sunset/survival provisions in the respective treaties (which is typically 10 to 15 years).

Free Trade Agreements (FTAs), Preferential Treatment Agreements (PTA) and investment chapters in international agreements (signed /entered in):

FTAs Substantive protections Procedural rights
Fair and Equitable Treatment (FET) Expropriation Protection and security Most-favoured-nation (MFN) Umbrella clause Cooling-off period Local courts Arbitration

Afghanistan–India PTA (13 May 2003) 

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

No

Yes

Agreement on SAARC Preferential Treatment Trading Agreement (7 December 1995) 

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

ASEAN–India Investment Agreement (1 July 2015) 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

No

No

180

days 

Yes   

Yes 

Asia-Pacific Trade Agreement (17 June 1976) 

No

No

No

Yes

No

No

No

No

Indo-Bhutan Agreement on Trade Commerce and Transit

(29 July 2017)

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

Australia-India ECTA (29 December 2022)

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

BIMSTEC Framework Agreement (30 June 2004) 

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

Chile–India (20 January 2005)

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

European Union Cooperation Agreement (1 August 1994) 

No

No

No

Yes 

No

No

No

No

Gulf Co-operation Council Framework Agreement (not in force) 

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

Japan CEPA (1 August 2011) 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

No

6

months

Yes 

Yes 

Korea CEPA (1 January 2010) 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

No

No

6 months 

Yes

Yes 

Malaysia Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement (CECA) (1 July 2011) 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes

No

180 days   

Yes 

Yes 

Mauritius CECPA (1 April 2021) 

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

MERCOSUR Framework Agreement (1 June 2009) 

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

Indo-Nepal Treaty of Trade – 27 November 2009) 

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

Singapore CECA (1 August 2005) 

No

Yes 

No

No[11]

No

6 months 

Yes 

Yes 

South Asian FTA (1 January 2006)   

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

Thailand FTA (not in force)

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

United Arab Emirates CEPA (1 May 2022) 

No

No

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

 

Answer contributed by , , , and

Qualifying criteria – any unique or distinguishing features?

2. What are the distinguishing features of the definition of “investor” in this country’s investment treaties?

India

Answer contributed by , , , and

3. What are the distinguishing features of the definition of "investment" in this country’s investment treaties?

India

Answer contributed by , , , and

Substantive protections – any unique or distinguishing features?

4. What are the distinguishing features of the fair and equitable treatment standard in this country’s investment treaties?

India

Answer contributed by , , , and

5. What are the distinguishing features of the protection against expropriation standard in this country’s investment treaties?

India

Answer contributed by , , , and

6. What are the distinguishing features of the national treatment/most-favoured-nation treatment standard in this country’s investment treaties?

India

Answer contributed by , , , and

7. What are the distinguishing features of the obligation to provide protection and security to qualifying investments in this country’s investment treaties?

India

Answer contributed by , , , and

8. What are the distinguishing features of the umbrella clauses contained within this country’s investment treaties?

India

Answer contributed by , , , and

9. What are the other most important substantive rights provided to qualifying investors in this country?

India

Answer contributed by , , , and

10. Do this country’s investment treaties exclude liability through carve-outs, non-precluded measures clauses, or denial of benefits clauses?

India

Answer contributed by , , , and

Procedural rights in this country’s investment treaties

11. Are there any relevant issues related to procedural rights in this country’s investment treaties?

India

Answer contributed by , , , and

12. What is the approach taken in this country’s investment treaties to standing dispute resolution bodies, bilateral or multilateral?

India

Answer contributed by , , , and

13. What is the status of this country’s investment treaties?

India

Answer contributed by , , , and

Practicalities of commencing an investment treaty claim against this country

14. To which governmental entity should notice of a dispute against this country under an investment treaty be sent? Is there a particular person or office to whom a dispute notice against this country should be addressed?

India

Answer contributed by , , , and

15. Which government department or departments manage investment treaty arbitrations on behalf of this country?

India

Answer contributed by , , , and

16. Are internal or external counsel used, or expected to be used, by the state in investment treaty arbitrations? If external counsel are used, does the state normally go through a formal public procurement process when hiring them?

India

Answer contributed by , , , and

Practicalities of enforcing an investment treaty claim against this country

17. Has the country signed and ratified the Washington Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (1965)? Please identify any legislation implementing the Washington Convention.

India

Answer contributed by , , , and

18. Has the country signed and ratified the United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1958) (the New York Convention)? Please identify any legislation implementing the New York Convention.

India

Answer contributed by , , , and

19. Does the country have legislation governing non-ICSID investment arbitrations seated within its territory?

India

Answer contributed by , , , and

20. Does the state have a history of voluntary compliance with adverse investment treaty awards; or have additional proceedings been necessary to enforce these against the state?

India

Answer contributed by , , , and

21. Describe the national government’s attitude towards investment treaty arbitration.

India

Answer contributed by , , , and

22. To what extent have local courts been supportive and respectful of investment treaty arbitration, including the enforcement of awards?

India

Answer contributed by , , , and

National legislation protecting outgoing foreign investment

24. Does the country have an investment guarantee scheme or offer political risk insurance that protects local investors when investing abroad? If so, what are the qualifying criteria, substantive protections provided and the means by which an investor can invoke the protections?

India

Answer contributed by , , , and

Unlock unlimited access to all Global Arbitration Review content