Gazprombank v Belarus: the value of requiring direct evidence to support illegality allegations

13 July 2020

Credit: iStock/Wara1982

Following Gazprombank’s recent threat to pursue a claim against Belarus over actions taken in a controversial and politically sensitive money-laundering investigation, Nikhil Gore and Amanda Tuninetti of Covington & Burling highlight the value of investment tribunals requiring direct evidence to support a state’s allegations of corruption and illegality against an investor.

Subscribe to Global Arbitration Review

Subscribe and start reading now

Global Arbitration Review (GAR) is the online home for international arbitration specialists, telling them everything they need to know about all the developments that matter.

Upgrade now

Gazprombank v Belarus: the value of requiring direct evidence to support illegality allegations

Subscribe to Global Arbitration Review

Subscribe and start reading now

Already have access? Login below

Related Topics