Gazprombank v Belarus: the value of requiring direct evidence to support illegality allegations
Following Gazprombank’s recent threat to pursue a claim against Belarus over actions taken in a controversial and politically sensitive money-laundering investigation, Nikhil Gore and Amanda Tuninetti of Covington & Burling highlight the value of investment tribunals requiring direct evidence to support a state’s allegations of corruption and illegality against an investor.
To read more
Subscribe to Global Arbitration Review
Subscribe and start reading now
Global Arbitration Review (GAR) is the online home for international arbitration specialists, telling them everything they need to know about all the developments that matter.
Already have access? Login below
Copyright © Law Business ResearchCompany Number: 03281866 VAT: GB 160 7529 10