The “activist” and “remotist” approaches to expert evidence
Chris Harris, Chris Boog, Michael Schneider and James Nicholson at the ASA conference (Credit: ASA)
This year’s Swiss Arbitration Association conference in Zurich explored how the common law and civil law traditions affect expectations about experts, with Michael Young QC setting out the contrasting “activist” and “remotist” views of their role.
To read more
Subscribe to Global Arbitration Review
Subscribe to unlock unlimited access
Get news, unique commentary, expert analysis and essential resources from the Global Arbitration Review experts.
Subscribe now