The “activist” and “remotist” approaches to expert evidence
Chris Harris, Chris Boog, Michael Schneider and James Nicholson at the ASA conference (Credit: ASA)
This year’s Swiss Arbitration Association conference in Zurich explored how the common law and civil law traditions affect expectations about experts, with Michael Young QC setting out the contrasting “activist” and “remotist” views of their role.
To read more
Subscribe to Global Arbitration Review
Subscribe and start reading now
Global Arbitration Review (GAR) is the online home for international arbitration specialists, telling them everything they need to know about all the developments that matter.
Upgrade now
Already have access? Login below
Copyright © Law Business ResearchCompany Number: 03281866 VAT: GB 160 7529 10