Why tribunals should not ignore “red flags” of corruption
Credit: Shutterstock
Responding to a recent GAR article on the value of requiring direct evidence to support allegations of illegality against an investor, Squire Patton Boggs partners John Branson and Raúl Manon argue that tribunals should be prepared to rely on “red flags” to make reasonable inferences about corruption when direct evidence is unavailable.
To read more
Subscribe to Global Arbitration Review
Subscribe and start reading now
Global Arbitration Review (GAR) is the online home for international arbitration specialists, telling them everything they need to know about all the developments that matter.
Upgrade now
Already have access? Login below
Copyright © Law Business ResearchCompany Number: 03281866 VAT: GB 160 7529 10