• Search

GAR 100 - 13th Edition

Peter & Kim

23 April 2020

A new boutique founded by leading Swiss and Korean practitioners, which also has a foothold in Australia – and soon Singapore too

People in Who's Who Legal 2
People in Future Leaders 2
Pending cases as counsel 10
Value of pending counsel work US$40.9 billion
Treaty cases 0
Third-party funded cases 1
Current arbitrator appointments 30 (9 as chair or sole)
Lawyers sitting as arbitrator 3

NEW ENTRY

Peter & Kim was launched at the start of 2020 by two prominent international arbitration lawyers, Wolfgang Peter of Switzerland and Kap-You (Kevin) Kim of South Korea. The new boutique is exclusively dedicated to arbitration and arbitration-related litigation.

Peter is a leading counsel and arbitrator who co-founded the Swiss firm now known as Python in the 1980s. He worked there for 34 years before breaking away with a team in 2015 to launch his own GAR 100 boutique, Peter & Partners.  

With a background in M&A law, Peter was counsel in a seminal ICC case in the 1990s concerning the break-up of Arthur Andersen. These days he is much in demand as an arbitrator – he recently chaired a panel that ordered Bulgaria to pay €600 million to a Russian state entity in a politically sensitive dispute over a nuclear power plant.

Kim joins after more than two decades at GAR 100 firm Bae Kim & Lee. He co-founded the Korean firm's international arbitration practice and is widely regarded as a pioneer of the field in Korea. He is a vice president of the ICC Court and the first chair of the Korean Commercial Arbitration Board’s international arbitration committee. He is also the president of the ICC Korea arbitration committee and served as the secretary general of the International Council for Commercial Arbitration from 2010 to 2014.

Peter brought his entire team over from Peter & Partners, including partners Christoph Brunner, Daniel Greineder (an English-qualified barrister) and Konstantin Christie; and of counsel Julia Xoudis. All are based in Geneva save for Brunner, who is in Bern.

Two former Bae Kim & Lee associates have followed Kim over to the new firm, joining as partners: Mino Han and Ara Cho.

The new firm also has a Sydney office headed by partner Jim Morrison, another former Bae Kim & Lee practitioner who had been an independent practitioner for the last few years.

Network

The firm has offices in Geneva, Bern, Seoul and Sydney. There are also plans to open an office in Singapore.

Track record

While it’s early days for the new firm, the track record of its name partners is formidable.

Peter has been acting for the National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC) in a highly sensitive multibillion-dollar dispute with the Israeli government over an abandoned oil pipeline joint venture that has spawned at least three arbitrations and various French and Swiss court actions over more than two decades.

As part of that dispute, Peter and his team helped NIOC secure a US$1.1 billion award in 2015 against an Israeli state-owned entity in compensation for oil shipments pre-dating the Iranian revolution of 1979. They have since helped NIOC fend off a challenge to the award in the Swiss courts.

While at Python, Peter and his team helped Turkish client Doğuş defend an UNCITRAL award against a Ukrainian state railway company, obtaining a landmark ruling from the Swiss Supreme Court in 2014 on the res judicata effect of foreign court decisions on Swiss-seated arbitral tribunals.

They have also acted for major European energy conglomerate in several gas-price reviews worth more than €1 billion.

While at Bae Kim & Lee, Kim’s case work included defending the Korean government against a US$5 billion ICSID claim brought by US private equity firm Loan Star Funds, and acting for Hyundai Heavy Industries in a US$2.3 billion ICC dispute.

Recent events

Among his last cases before leaving Bae Kim & Lee, Kim helped Hyundai Heavy Industries settle an US$8.4 billion ICC claim it brought by Qatar Petroleum over repairs to an offshore gas project.

He also acted for state-owned Korea Electric Power Corporation in a US$500 million LCIA dispute with a Hyundai-Samsung joint venture over the construction of a nuclear power plant in the UAE.

The firm reports it is acting in an ad hoc gas purchase dispute in the Middle East worth over US$30 billion; and is joint lead counsel to a methane gas exploration company in a joint venture dispute with major Asian state-owned enterprises. The latter dispute is governed by Chinese law and worth US$1.8 billion.

Peter has been sitting on a tribunal hearing a case over a multibillion-dollar metro project in Qatar.

Insight

Reviews

Regional analysis from arbitrators around the globe, focussing on key developments in specific industry areas and jurisdictions.

Meaar 2020 reviews banner 20x5

The Middle Eastern and African Arbitration Review 2020

Highlights

AfCFTA and the Upcoming Protocol on Investment: What Can Investors Expect?

Théobald Naud, Maxime Desplats and Ophélie Divoy

DLA Piper

Analysing Liquidity: When the State of Matter matters to Expert Valuers in Damages Assessments

Jonathan Ruffell, Steve Harris and James Church-Morley

FTI Consulting