• Search

GAR 100 - 13th Edition

AZB & Partners

08 April 2020

Two wins for Mauritian funds in commercial cases, while the firm represents Nissan in a treaty claim

People in Who's Who Legal 1

AZB was born in 2004 from a merger between CZB & Partners in Mumbai, and Ajay Bahl & Company in Delhi. Today the firm has four offices in India.

The firm has moved away from Indian law firms’ traditional family-style structure and has been praised for its clear partnership track.

AZB’s reputation owes much to the personality and profile of founding partner Zia Mody in Mumbai. She spent three years as vice president of the LCIA and has acted in numerous cases under that institution’s rules, as well as those of the ICC, SCC, LMAA, SIAC and UNCITRAL.

Senior partner Rajendra Barot in Mumbai leads the dispute resolution practice. Another strong name is Vijayendra Pratap Singh, partner and head of litigation in Delhi, who has spearheaded arbitrations related to option contracts, shareholder disputes and intellectual property issues.

Who uses it?

Swiss Timing (a subsidiary of the Swatch Group) used the firm in a landmark case before the High Court of Delhi that changed the law on the arbitrability of fraud.

The former majority shareholders of Yukos Oil Company used the firm for a Delhi action to enforce their US$50 billion awards against Russia, which was discontinued.

Other recent clients include Tata Group; Eastern India Power Limited; the owners of the Indian Premier League franchise cricket team Kochi Tuskers; India’s largest telecoms company, Bharti Airtel; Axis Bank; HSBC; and the Bank of New York Mellon’s London branch.

Past clients include Vedanta Resources, KPMG, Philip Morris, Dhariwal Industries, Lehman Brothers and US cable television network ESPN. It has also acted for Indian property developer Kabul Chawla and his company, BPTP.

Track record

In one of its highest-profile cases, the firm defended Tata Sons in an LCIA claim brought by Japan’s largest mobile operator, NTT Docomo, over a short-lived internet services venture. The arbitration ended in 2016 with a US$1.17 billion award against Tata. The award was paid in the following year, after Delhi litigation that had seen the intervention of the Reserve Bank of India in a bid to thwart payment.

For clients SMS and Solar Industries India, the firm obtained wins in two ad hoc claims against a mining company owned by the Indian state of Chhattisgarh. The dispute concerned a joint venture to exploit two coal blocks. AZB’s clients filed for arbitration after India’s Supreme Court held that the licences for the blocks were illegal. The tribunal upheld the clients’ claims regarding frustration and restitution.

Recent events

AZB obtained a victory for Mauritian fund Rishima Investments in a Singapore-seated ICC arbitration. In 2019, the tribunal unanimously awarded Rishima US$110 million, representing a 25% rate of return on its investment in an Indian company developing a hotel in Kolkata.

Acting for another Mauritian private equity fund in two international commercial arbitrations under SIAC rules, the firm secured US$11 million in damages for breach of contract as well as costs for its client. The firm is representing the fund in enforcement proceedings before the Bombay High Court.

With co-counsel Allen & Overy and Indian firm Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan in New Delhi, the firm continues to act for Japanese car maker Nissan in a US$478 million investment treaty claim against India. Nissan says India has unfairly withheld payments promised in return for the company investing in a car plant in Chennai. AZB has successfully thwarted repeated attempts by the government of Tamil Nadu to obtain an anti-arbitration injunction before the Madras High Court. An UNCITRAL tribunal upheld jurisdiction over the treaty case in 2019, a decision that is now being challenged by India in the Singapore courts.

Dhirajkumar Totala became a partner in the firm’s Mumbai office in April 2019.

Related articles

  • The Asia-Pacific Arbitration Review 2021


  • The Middle Eastern and African Arbitration Review 2020




Regional analysis from arbitrators around the globe, focussing on key developments in specific industry areas and jurisdictions.

The asia pacific arbitration review 2021 20x5

The Asia-Pacific Arbitration Review 2021


Arbitration in mainland China’s free trade zones aiming to match international standards

Disputes in construction and infrastructure projects

Craig Shepherd, Daniel Waldek and Mitchell Dearness

Herbert Smith Freehills LLP