• Search

GAR 100 - 10th Edition

Fangda Partners

10 March 2017

A mainland Chinese firm with a presence in Hong Kong

People in Who’s Who Legal 2
Pending cases as counsel 14
Value of pending counsel work US$413 million
Treaty cases 0
Current arbitrator appointments 31 (of which 18 are as sole or chair)
Lawyers sitting as arbitrator 5

Founded in 1993, Fangda Partners was one of the first law firms established under mainland China’s contemporary legal system. It now boasts over 150 lawyers offering commercial law services in Beijing, Shanghai and Shenzhen, as well as a presence in Hong Kong through an association with Peter Yuen & Associates.

Its name comprises two Chinese characters – fang, meaning integrity, and da, meaning open-mindedness – which the firm says provides “a short-form mission statement”.

The firm has been advising foreign investors in China on disputes since the early days, but the international arbitration practice really came to the fore after the opening of the Beijing office in 2004 and the addition of new US-trained practitioners with deeper international experience. In 2007, the firm added former CIETAC deputy secretary general Ming Kang.

Nowadays, the firm says the dispute resolution team consists of around 40 lawyers. Besides handling CIETAC work, it frequently teams up with leading foreign firms for ad hoc and institutional arbitrations under the major rules and provides expertise on Chinese law in overseas proceedings. It is also one of the few Chinese firms to have independently and successfully represented both Chinese and foreign clients in international arbitrations in Hong Kong and Singapore.

Increasingly, clients are using it in arbitration-related court proceedings in China.

Prominent members of the practice group include Daniel Huang, the first partner at the firm to specialise in arbitration, who has handled dozens of cases about foreign investments; US-trained senior corporate lawyer Xiang Ji, who is said to be a household name in China for his skills in public debate; and veteran litigator and expert in construction arbitration Nuo Ji.

Helen Shi is an internationally experienced specialist in handling CIETAC cases (she also sits as an arbitrator for the centre), while Benjamin Miao has spent six years with a UK magic circle firm in Shanghai and Hong Kong.


The firm has offices in Beijing, Shanghai and Shenzhen. Since 2012, it has offered litigation and international arbitration capabilities in Hong Kong through a formal association with Peter Yuen & Associates – headed by a former Freshfields partner and including bilingual lawyers qualified in Hong Kong, English and Singaporean law. This has prompted speculation that the firm may aspire to open other international offices beyond China.

Who uses it?

Clients include Citibank, China National Offshore Oil Company, Deloitte, GE, JPMorgan, Morgan Stanley, HSBC, Texas Pacific Group and IDG Group.

The firm was instructed by US energy company ConocoPhillips to settle a US$230 million environmental claim brought by the Chinese government arising from an oil spill in the Yellow Sea – by far the largest such claim in China to date. It has also co-counselled the same client in a related US lawsuit brought by Chinese fishermen.

It acted as Chinese counsel to one of the big four firms in a US Securities and Exchange Commission investigation concerning the audit of a US-listed Chinese company; and for an Asian private equity firm fighting a US$20 million claim by a former partner in relation to their separation agreement.

Track record

Fangda helped a European real estate investment fund win a US$31 million award in 2015 after a six-year dispute over a transfer of property. The same year, the firm helped a client win 90% of its claim in a leasing dispute at the Shanghai International Arbitration Centre; and achieved a favourable settlement in a dispute over a US$300 million real estate development in Beijing that did not get the approval of Chinese security services.

In 2013, the firm acted for a large Chinese state-owned construction company in a London-seated UNCITRAL arbitration with the road authority of an African state. The parties settled their dispute, which was worth over US$100 million. It also says it gained a landslide win plus costs for a Spanish client in a Hong Kong seated UNCITRAL arbitration with two Chinese entities.

Looking further back, the firm famously advised leading Chinese beverage company Wahaha in a CIETAC arbitration with French dairy company Danone, which was settled on terms that were regarded as favourable to the French company.

It also acted for a Chinese business celebrity in a US$100 million Hong Kong-seated ICC arbitration against an international mobile service network – achieving a settlement in favour of the client.

In 2010, the firm was engaged by a Chinese airline in a contractual dispute with a Canadian pilot academy under ICC rules and before a New Zealand arbitrator. English was the arbitration language, meaning that until Fangda’s engagement the Chinese airline had been disadvantaged. With the firm on board, the client won (Fangda lawyers provided four rounds of written submissions and cross-examined witnesses in English).

It obtained a favourable settlement for a global private equity client in relation to an ICC claim for fraudulent misrepresentation against a Bermuda company holding two wholly foreign-owned enterprises in China.

Its performances in the Chinese courts include enforcing the first ever Hong Kong-made ICC award for a European client in Shanghai in 2009, soon after the ICC Court opened its Asia office.

Recent events

The firm hired two new partners in Shanghai, Jason Li and Shanjian Zheng. It also promoted three new partners – Hans She in Shanghai, Yanhua Lin in Beijing and Damien McDonald in Hong Kong. Michael Edwards was also promoted to counsel in Beijing, and in Hong Kong Fangda hired senior associate Matthew Townsend from Norton Rose Fulbright. Beijing partner Hong (Helen) Shi was named as a new alternate ICC Court member for China.

Fangda successfully defended a Chinese client in a sale of goods dispute at SHIAC, where the tribunal rejected the claimant’s case entirely and partially upheld the client’s counterclaim. It won a good settlement for an international hotel management company after a two-year arbitration worth US$60 million.

At CIETAC, a Hong Kong real estate client won the entirety of its US$30 million-plus claim against a Chinese industrial company. In another case, the firm defeated a US$90 million claim against a German manufacturing client.

Pending work includes acting for a Korean company in a rare China-seated SIAC arbitration over liquid and gaseous products. It is also defending 14 parties in a US$150 million HKIAC arbitration with a pension fund involving claims of misrepresentation.


Related articles




Regional analysis from arbitrators around the globe, focussing on key developments in specific industry areas and jurisdictions.

The asia pacific arbitration review 2021 20x5

The Asia-Pacific Arbitration Review 2021


Arbitration in mainland China’s free trade zones aiming to match international standards

Disputes in construction and infrastructure projects

Craig Shepherd, Daniel Waldek and Mitchell Dearness

Herbert Smith Freehills LLP