Gazprombank v Belarus: the value of requiring direct evidence to support illegality allegations
Following Gazprombank’s recent threat to pursue a claim against Belarus over actions taken in a controversial and politically sensitive money-laundering investigation, Nikhil Gore and Amanda Tuninetti of Covington & Burling highlight the value of investment tribunals requiring direct evidence to support a state’s allegations of corruption and illegality against an investor.
To read more
Subscribe to Global Arbitration Review
Subscribe to unlock unlimited access
Get news, unique commentary, expert analysis and essential resources from the Global Arbitration Review experts.