Do BITs really promote foreign direct investment?
While bilateral investment treaties purport to help “host” states attract foreign direct investment from “home” states, Sarita Patil Woolhouse of the UK’s Anglia Ruskin University says an analysis of FDI flows and hundreds of ICSID cases suggests that the routes taken by investments are driven not by the origin of capital but by tax considerations, and that states may therefore only need to sign BITs with a handful of tax havens.
To read more
Subscribe to Global Arbitration Review
Subscribe and start reading now
Global Arbitration Review (GAR) is the online home for international arbitration specialists, telling them everything they need to know about all the developments that matter.