Minds meet over regulation
Sebastian Perry • Wednesday, 5 June 2013 (10 months ago)
A much-anticipated debate between Sundaresh Menon and Jan Paulsson on the desirability of a regulatory framework for international arbitration ended with a surprising consensus on the need for arbitral institutions to take the lead in policing ethical conduct – with Menon seemingly retreating from previously expressed views. Sebastian Perry reports
Menon and Paulsson: plenty to agree on
Premium Subscription required to view this article
This content can only be accessed by Premium subscribers.
This content is part of the GAR archive and can only be accessed by subscribers with a Premium Subscription.
If you are a subscriber, please login: