Minds meet over regulation

Sebastian Perry Wednesday, 5 June 2013 (over a year ago)

A much-anticipated debate between Sundaresh Menon and Jan Paulsson on the desirability of a regulatory framework for international arbitration ended with a surprising consensus on the need for arbitral institutions to take the lead in policing ethical conduct – with Menon seemingly retreating from previously expressed views. Sebastian Perry reports

Menon and Paulsson: plenty to agree on

Menon and Paulsson: plenty to agree on

Premium Subscription required to view this article

This content can only be accessed by Premium subscribers.

This content is part of the GAR archive and can only be accessed by subscribers with a Premium Subscription.

Subscribe

If you are a subscriber, please login:

Comments

You must Subscribe or Log In to make comments.

Comment Terms & Conditions

Back to top

Law Business Research Ltd

87 Lancaster Road, London
W11 1QQ, UK
Queen's Award logo American Bar Association strategic partner logo

Copyright © 2014 Law Business Research Ltd. All rights reserved. | http://www.lbresearch.com

87 Lancaster Road, London, W11 1QQ, UK | Tel: +44 207 908 1188 / Fax: +44 207 229 6910

http://www.globalarbitrationreview.com | editorial@globalarbitrationreview.com